A House on Fire: Why Martin Luther King’s Concerns Still Apply to Our Culture

By Lisa Race

The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. commented about the soul of America five days before his assassination. Speaking to Harry Belafonte after a meeting, he mentioned that he was confident of the successful passing of pending integration laws, but he feared that “we are integrating into a burning house. I’m afraid that America has lost the moral vision she may have had, and I’m afraid that even as we integrate, we are walking into a place that does not understand, that this nation needs to be deeply concerned with the plight of the poor and the disenfranchised.” King explained that if those concerns continued to go unmet, our nation would disintegrate into Sodom and Gomorrah.

The responsibility of the ruling class or the national government has never been to legislate morality. Nevertheless, caring for the poor has been part of the national consciousness in literature and art — and partially accomplished through paying taxes that support programs for people with low incomes. Scripture calls us to pay taxes (Matthew 22:15–22, Romans 13:6–7), and “whoever is kind to the poor lends to the Lord, and he will reward them for what they have done” (Proverbs 19:17).

History has also included a contest over the control of resources through colonization, slavery and genocide of certain classes or groups of people. If anything, the United States of America had improved rapidly by King’s time. In the 1960s, civil disobedience was much more possible than ever in U.S. history. His pursuit of peace through nonviolent protest provided evidence that immorality has marred God’s creation since the fall of humans recorded in Genesis 3.

Most likely, King’s remarks were acceptance that he had not been subject to the full vent of humans’ immoral tendencies, but he was surprised by the extent he had experienced these tendencies.

_

 “Through Moses’ obedience, God created a nation.”

The Fall, the Flood, and the Law

Humans’ spiritual lives were lost so they eventually would die physically after the fall. The entire creation became a dangerous atmosphere that would resist the ingenuity of man, forcing Adam to labor with difficulty for what God freely provided in His gift of the Garden of Eden. Eve was now demoted from equal status as ruler to being subjugated to her husband who would rule over her. Her ability to be a conduit of life was marred with physical pain and groaning. The lives of their children were marked with murder, competition, envy, and greed as they used all the wrong avenues to try and procure God’s favor.

The immorality grew to the point that the Lord was appalled at humans’ capacity for evil — so appalled that He regretted the creation of humankind (Genesis 6:6). There was a great flood. The Lord nearly wiped humans off the face of the earth because He knew there was no cure for what was coursing through their veins. The flood killed every living creature except for a chosen few.

Humans were held accountable for their actions, and the enemy was thwarted from creating a new race perverting God’s creation. God remained sovereign. He would begin again with a small family and cover the earth, according to His original plan. He saved the obedient man who built an ark according to His instruction. Noah’s obedience saved his family in the time of destruction, and he was chosen to repopulate the earth. Noah is the father of us all.

However, the children of Noah still struggled with the curse of their sin nature. Although they multiplied, they continued to be a wayward people, stubborn and full of pride, until they were taken into captivity in Egypt and cried out for God to save them. The Lord heard their cry and raised their deliverer in the safety of the Pharoah’s palace as an adopted son. While his relatives were being destroyed through enslavement and the genocide of the male children in Israel, Moses basked in the comfort of royal favor and all the benefits that life afforded him. Well-educated, well-fed, well-clothed, and wealthy while his biological mother watched over him, he was prepared to lead a great exodus through obedience to the Lord who can burn a bush while it lives and speak through the flames.

Through Moses’ obedience, God created a nation. He took Israel’s children and began to teach them that there would be a Messiah for them, but, in the meantime, they needed to learn what it really means to procure the favor of God. They were given a law much more complicated than Adam’s one requirement. They were to trust, follow and worship God faithfully without making gods of silver or gold as they had previously done. They had a mandate to enter the Promised Land. Moses was given the ability to produce water from a rock. As they moved toward the land promised to them, they had to conquer the sinful residents of the lands in which they were to settle.

God was their King, and their leader represented God to them as they asked. But their sinful hearts began to rebel. Moses allowed them to make him angry, and he disobeyed God as well. An entire generation died in the wilderness, and Moses could only see the Promised Land from a great distance. Was he immoral? Were they? By God’s standards, yes.

A new generation crossed the Jordan to a portion of the Promised Land and became disconnected over time from Joshua’s leadership. Joshua makes the declaration “choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve. … But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord” (Joshua 24:15). The people slid into a time of spiritual aridness and began doing whatever they felt was right in their own eyes.

The book of Judges outlines the ruin of a nation whom God repeatedly sought to win over with those He raised up to judge Israel. But the Law was not remembered, and the people continued down a slippery slope into pride and selfishness. In time, the people no longer wanted God to lead them, and they requested a king just as the other nations had. They were warned that a human king would take their independence and wealth, but they still wanted a king.

Saul was given to them, and he rebelled against the Lord by not eliminating the enemies of Israel. Eventually, as Israel continued to rebel against the instructions of God, the people the Israelites did not remove from the land were the people God used to send them to captivity. Was Israel immoral? By God’s standards, yes.

What Exactly Is Morality?

Morality is generally defined as principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or moral and immoral behavior — more specifically, a particular system of values and principles of conduct.

Discernment of these values will depend on the source of the principles. Because King was a Baptist preacher, I will focus on the principles of Judaism and Christianity. No doubt King felt that segregation laws were not rooted in the Christian thought that influenced the nation’s founding.

God’s love is inclusive. The U.S. Declaration of Independence speaks of “unalienable rights” — rooted in the idea of the Imago Dei — using the word created to describe the value inherent in man. There is not a person who is excluded from this description of the benefits afforded by this identifier. God’s sacrificial gift was meant for the world — not for a select few; therefore, African American history is a story of striving for freedom and justice surrounding humanity and equity surrounding economic stability.

_

 “His concern was that a burning house would result from the spiritual capacity for sin among people who were taught that sin was right.”

_v

King felt that integration would simply bring integration alone and not the fullness of what that should mean because of the immorality that fueled the burning house. He was a reverend who represented God in the mission of nonviolent pursuit of peace through integration. This holy war was fought without worldly weapons in a culture where people committed crimes of humanity while others looked away. People made in the image of God were being subjugated to a political, legal, and psychological cage with bars of inferiority, invisibility, and futility — as well as relegation to service as their life vocation rather than recognition for great achievements in a variety of fields.

Integration would signify that it is illegal to imagine a person of African descent as inferior to oneself, or to discriminate by dismissing a person’s existence through exclusion or enforcing their inexistence by various means. It should mean equal opportunity for education and vocation as well as equal protection under the law.

But King’s concern was not the laws or the enforcement of them. He had won that war empirically although not ideologically. His concepts of full freedom for all people are still being developed and slowly taking hold. His concern was that a burning house would result from the spiritual capacity for sin among people who were taught that sin was right.

King knew he could never see the legislation of the spiritual decisions of the inner man in any culture, and he might be sending people — the poor and those deprived of their right to vote — into an inferno of broken law. God sent a nation into exile partially because not helping the poor is seen as a direct act of disregard for the vulnerable and a violation of God’s command to show compassion and justice toward all people, particularly those in need. God identifies with the plight of the poor and considers acts of kindness as acts of worship.

Oppressing the poor so that they cannot advance would be seen as heinous in the eyes of the Lord. What does God’s Law say about assisting the poor? The Hebrew word tzedakah is symbolic for the responsibility of helping the poor, which is not just an act of charity. This help is about righteousness and justice, about assisting people in reaching their full potential with dignity and respect. It teaches that we should speak up and advocate for the poor. It also represents the idea of readily giving to the needy without regrets. Gleanings should be left for the poor from the harvest (Leviticus 23:21–23).

We are instructed to open our arms (Proverbs 31:20) and lend to the poor whatever they need. The highest form of this word is helping someone find employment or a business partnership or giving them a gift or a loan. Jesus exemplified this in healing and feeding the people without complaint, because He knew it would please the Father. Often these healings would mean that a person was restored as a provider and contributor to the community.

_

 “Human laws can be repealed; God’s law cannot.”

_v

This is not a new train of thought. Jesus told His disciples that the world would hate them (John 15:18–25). He did not want us to be surprised by that. It is to be expected that the house will burn, and immorality will be a problem if humans have a sin nature.

A law can make legal whatever seems right and good to humans at the time, but it does not impact the standards that God set for humans to recognize their failure to meet God’s standards and find relief in Jesus Christ who met the standards on their behalf. The kingdom of God is not the kingdoms of this world and is not subject to mistakes in judgment. Human laws can be repealed; God’s law cannot.

The house has been on fire since humanity’s fall. There was a time when the fire was out after the great flood, but gradually it ignited again and sometimes burns at the rate of central heat and other times at the rate of jet fuel. Now we are possibly looking at a nuclear event. However, the Law trains the mind of the unbeliever, yet those under grace are responsible for the condition of this fire.

Sometimes the Lord will send those in His church into a burning house because they are mandated to put out the fire. God told Solomon that it was not the temple that he built that would solve this problem, but if His people would turn away from their sin and pray, then He would heal the land (2 Chronicles 7:11–22).

The world and government are not the answers. Instead the answers include recognizing the need for the church (including Christians who serve in government positions) to submit to God’s will, repent as needed, and pray. Repentance might mean that preaching, discipleship, and passion for missions will change, and the flow of finances will be diverted to what might be more of a priority for God.

This is not a new position for the church. Over the years, the church has continued to reform, and 2026 will be no different.

But, as an individual member of a congregation, will you need to examine your relationship with the church staff and members? Is your heart ready to partner with church leaders in the coming season for the work of the gospel? Will you examine work and family relationships and note the position of your heart? Are there some changes needed in your personal walk with Christ?

_

 “Turn away from the sources of pain and give your life to the source of peace. Ask Him to put out the flames in your life.”

_v

Have you considered what happens after you die? Are you aware that Jesus Christ has met the conditions of the Law so that everything in your life not meeting God’s standard will be wiped away? Do you know He has made it possible for you to be in right standing with God, and heaven is close? Do you know your life no longer needs to include the fear and anxiety associated with a burning house?

If you find the answers to these questions result in strife, pain and frustration, you are a great candidate to be a firefighter. Turn away from the sources of pain and give your life to the source of peace. Tell the Lord you want Him to save you from the burning house. Ask Him to put out the flames in your life. Tell Him you will do things His way from now on and release everything into His hands. From now on, He is Lord, and you will serve Him all the days of your life. Then ask Him how you can assist the poor and the disenfranchised for Him.

King’s last remark about the burning house was to put out the fire. How will you respond to the call? Will you just focus on the burning house? Or will you walk hand in hand with Christ and quench the flames?

+